A Maximum Likelihood Method to Improve Faint‐Source Flux and Color Estimates
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Vol. 110 (748) , 727-731
- https://doi.org/10.1086/316173
Abstract
Flux estimates for faint sources or transients are systematically biased high because there are far more truly faint sources than bright. Corrections that account for this effect are presented as a function of signal‐to‐noise ratio and the (true) slope of the faint‐source number‐flux relation. The corrections depend on the source being originally identified in the image in which it is being photometered. If a source has been identified in other data, the corrections are different; a prescription for calculating the corrections is presented. Implications of these corrections for analyses of surveys are discussed; the most important is that sources identified at signal‐to‐noise ratios of 4 or less are practically useless.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Counts and colours of faint galaxies in the U and R bandsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1997
- Near Infrared Imaging of the Hubble Deep Field with the Keck TelescopeThe Astronomical Journal, 1997
- SExtractor: Software for source extractionAstronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 1996
- Deep Optical Galaxy Counts with the Keck TelescopeThe Astrophysical Journal, 1995
- Galaxy number counts - III. Deep CCD observations to B=27.5 magMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1995
- Deep galaxy counts in the K band with the Kech telescopeThe Astrophysical Journal, 1995
- A practical method to improve luminosity calibrations from trigonometric parallaxesMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1979
- Confusion and Flux-Density Error DistributionsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1974
- On the Use of Trigonometric Parallaxes for the Calibration of Luminosity Systems: TheoryPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1973
- On a Formula for Correcting Statistics for the Effects of a known Probable Error of ObservationMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1913