Evaluation of suspected local recurrence in head and neck cancer: A comparison between PET and PET/CT for biopsy proven lesions
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 62 (2) , 199-204
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.037
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Head and Neck Malignancy: Is PET/CT More Accurate than PET or CT Alone?Radiology, 2005
- Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Usefulness and Accuracy of PET/CT Image FusionRadiology, 2004
- Whole-Body Dual-Modality PET/CT and Whole-Body MRI for Tumor Staging in OncologyJAMA, 2003
- Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Integrated Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed TomographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Positron Emission Tomography and PET CT of the Head and Neck: FDG Uptake in Normal Anatomy, in Benign Lesions, and in Changes Resulting from TreatmentAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2002
- Clinical Utility of FDG-PET in Detecting Head and Neck Tumors A Comparison of Diagnostic Methods and ModalitiesClinical Positron Imaging, 2000
- Primary and Recurrent Early Stage Laryngeal Cancer: Preliminary Results of 2-[Fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose PET ImagingRadiology, 1999
- Detection of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinomas after radiation therapy with 2‐18f‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomographyThe Laryngoscope, 1999
- Prospective comparison of 18 F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancerEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 1998
- ROC Methodology in Radiologic ImagingInvestigative Radiology, 1986