Ethnicity and clinical outcomes in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Preprint
- 8 September 2020
- preprint
- Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in medRxiv
Abstract
Importance: The association of ethnicity with outcomes in patients with COVID-19 is unclear.Objective: To determine whether the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality are associated with ethnicity.Data Sources: We searched all English language articles published 1st December 2019 - 30th June 2020 within MEDLINE, EMBASE, PROSPERO and the Cochrane library using indexing terms for COVID-19 and ethnicity, as well as manuscripts awaiting peer review on MedRxiv during the same period.Study Selection: Included studies reported original clinical data, disaggregated by ethnicity, on patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. We excluded correspondence, area level, modelling and basic science articles. Two independent reviewers screened articles for inclusion. Of 926 identified articles, 35 were included in the meta-analyses.Data Extraction and Synthesis: The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Reviewers independently extracted data using a piloted form on: (1) rates of infection, ICU admission and mortality by ethnicity; and (2) unadjusted and adjusted data comparing ethnic minority and White groups. Data were pooled using random effects models.Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes were: (1) infection with SARS-CoV-2 confirmed on molecular testing; (2) ICU admission; and (3) mortality in COVID-19 confirmed and suspected cases.Results: 13,535,562 patients from 35 studies were included in the meta-analyses. Black, Asian and Hispanic individuals had a greater risk of infection compared to White individuals (Black: pooled adjusted RR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.59-2.67; Asian: 1.35, 95%CI: 1.15-1.59; Hispanic: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.39-2.25). Black individuals were significantly more likely to be admitted to ICU than White individuals (pooled adjusted RR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.02-2.55). Risk of mortality was similar across ethnicities among hospitalised patients, but increased among Asian and Mixed ethnic groups in the general population.Conclusions: Black, Asian and Hispanic ethnic groups are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Black individuals may be more likely to require ICU admission for COVID-19. There may also be disparities in risk of death from COVID-19 at a population level. Our findings are of critical public health importance and should inform policy on minimising SARS-CoV-2 exposure in ethnic minority groups.KEY POINTS: Question: Is ethnicity associated with vulnerability to, and outcomes from, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)?Findings: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, rates of infection and outcomes from COVID-19 were compared between ethnic groups. Individuals from Black, Asian and Hispanic ethnicity were significantly more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection than those of White ethnicity. Black individuals were more likely to need intensive care unit (ICU) admission for COVID-19 than White individuals. Risk of mortality was similar across ethnicities among hospitalised patients, but increased among Asian and Mixed ethnic groups in the general population.Meaning: There is strong evidence for an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst ethnic minorities, and targeted public health policies are required to reduce this risk.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: , 29-30, 100630.
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- COVID-19 and African AmericansJAMA, 2020
- Ethnicity and COVID-19: an urgent public health research priorityThe Lancet, 2020
- Racism and discrimination in COVID-19 responsesPublished by Elsevier ,2020
- Drug-resistant enteric fever worldwide, 1990 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMC Medicine, 2020
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of InterventionsPublished by Wiley ,2019
- How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2010
- Spontaneous improvement in randomised clinical trials: meta-analysis of three-armed trials comparing no treatment, placebo and active interventionBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- Access to health care for ethnic minority populationsPostgraduate Medical Journal, 2005
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- Aortic regurgitation in the tuskegee study of untreated syphilisJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1973