Exposure Misclassification and Threshold Concentrations in Time Series Analyses of Air Pollution Health Effects
- 11 December 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 22 (6) , 1183-1193
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00282
Abstract
Linear, no‐threshold relationships are typically reported for time series studies of air pollution and mortality. Since regulatory standards and economic valuations typically assume some threshold level, we evaluated the fundamental question of the impact of exposure misclassification on the persistence of underlying personal‐level thresholds when personal data are aggregated to the population level in the assessment of exposure‐response relationships. As an example, we measured personal exposures to two particle metrics, PM2.5 and sulfate (SO42−), for a sample of lung disease patients and compared these with exposures estimated from ambient measurements. Previous work has shown that ambient:personal correlations for PM2.5 are much lower than for SO42−, suggesting that ambient PM2.5 measurements misclassify exposures to PM2.5. We then developed a method by which the measured:estimated exposure relationships for these patients were used to simulate personal exposures for a larger population and then to estimate individual‐level mortality risks under different threshold assumptions. These individual risks were combined to obtain the population risk of death, thereby exhibiting the prominence (and the value) of the threshold in the relationship between risk and estimated exposure. Our results indicated that for poorly classified exposures (PM2.5 in this example) population‐level thresholds were apparent at lower ambient concentrations than specified common personal thresholds, while for well‐classified exposures (e.g., SO42−), the apparent thresholds were similar to these underlying personal thresholds. These results demonstrate that surrogate metrics that are not highly correlated with personal exposures obscure the presence of thresholds in epidemiological studies of larger populations, while exposure indicators that are highly correlated with personal exposures can accurately reflect underlying personal thresholds.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing confounding, effect modification, and thresholds in the association between ambient particles and daily deaths.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000
- Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000
- PM 2.5 and Mortality in Long-Term Prospective Cohort Studies: Cause-Effect or Statistical Associations?Environmental Health Perspectives, 1998
- Health and Respirable Particulate (PM 10 ) Air Pollution: A Causal or Statistical Association?Environmental Health Perspectives, 1996
- Study design for exposure assessment in epidemiological studiesScience of The Total Environment, 1995
- Epidemiologic studies on short-term effects of low levels of major ambient air pollution components.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1995
- Epidemiologic Studies on Short-Term Effects of Low Levels of Major Ambient Air Pollution ComponentsEnvironmental Health Perspectives, 1995
- Review of Epidemiological Evidence of Health Effects of Particulate Air PollutionInhalation Toxicology, 1995
- Acute Respiratory Effects of Particulate Air PollutionAnnual Review of Public Health, 1994
- Valuing the Health Benefits of Clean AirScience, 1992