Vision for a Global Registry of Anticipated Public Health Studies
Open Access
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 97 (Supplement) , S82-S87
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2005.081711
Abstract
In public health, the generation, management, and transfer of knowledge all need major improvement. Problems in generating knowledge include an imbalance in research funding, publication bias, unnecessary studies, adherence to fashion, and undue interest in novel and immediate issues. Impaired generation of knowledge, combined with a dated and inadequate process for managing knowledge and an inefficient system for transferring knowledge, mean a distorted body of evidence available for decisionmaking in public health. This article hopes to stimulate discussion by proposing a Global Registry of Anticipated Public Health Studies. This prospective, comprehensive system for tracking research in public health could help enhance collaboration and improve efficiency. Practical problems must be discussed before such a vision can be further developed.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of ResearchEvaluation & the Health Professions, 2006
- Understanding and Minimizing Epidemiologic Bias in Public Health ResearchCanadian Journal of Public Health, 2005
- The Immediate vs the ImportantPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2004
- Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000JAMA, 2004
- Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for coursesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003
- The search for new risk factors for coronary heart disease: occupational therapy for epidemiologists?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- From Research to “Best Practices” in Other Settings and PopulationsAmerican Journal of Health Behavior, 2001
- The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- RE: "INVITED COMMENTARY: CIRCULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY"American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Between circular and cul-de-sac epidemiologyThe Lancet, 2000