Improving the Design of Muscle Relaxant Studies
Open Access
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 86 (1) , 48-54
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199701000-00008
Abstract
Background: The results from studies of muscle relaxants show wide variations among institutions. The authors hypothesized that some of this variability could be explained by differences in duration of nerve stimulation before drug administration (stabilization period). Methods: Train-of-four stimulation was applied every 12 s to both ulnar nerves and adductor pollicis twitch tension was measured in anesthetized participants given 30 micrograms/kg vecuronium. In phase 1, the stabilization period was > 30 min for both extremities. In phase 2-4, stabilization period was 20 min for one extremity and 2 min for the other. In addition, in phase 3, a 2-s 50-Hz tetanus initiated the 2-min stimulation period; in phase 4, duration of tetanus was 5 s. Twitch recovery was recorded until stable for more than 15 min. Time to 25% recovery (clinical duration) was calculated based on two indices: predrug and final (recovery) twitch tension. Values for onset and clinical duration were compared by paired parametric and nonparametric tests. Results: In phase 1, predrug and recovery twitch tension were similar in each extremity, and onset and clinical duration did not differ between extremities, permitting paired comparisons in remaining studies. In phase 2, onset was more rapid with 20-min of prestimulation. With 20-min prestimulation, predrug and recovery twitch tension were similar; with 2-min prestimulation, recovery twitch tension exceeded predrug values. When referenced to predrug twitch tension, clinical duration was shorter with 2-min, that with 20-min prestimulation. Initiating stimulation with 2-s or 5-s 50-Hz tetani (phases 3, 4) abolished differences between extremities in onset and recovery. Conclusions: With only train-of-four stimulation (no tetani), onset and clinical duration vary with duration of prestimulation, suggesting that a brief period of predrug stimulation is inadequate. However, lengthy prestimulation may be impractical in clinical studies. Tetanic stimulation for 2 or 5 s obviates the need for prolonged stabilization during studies of muscle relaxants.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agentsActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1996
- The Influence of the Duration of Control Stimulation on the Onset and Recovery of Neuromuscular BlockAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1995
- Monitoring of the neuromuscular transmission by electromyography (I). Stability and temperature dependence of evoked EMG response compared to mechanical twitch recordings in the catActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1992
- Endocrine responses to positive end‐expiratory pressure ventilation in patients who have recently undergone heart surgeryActa Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 1991
- The Relationship Between Adductor Pollicis Twitch Tension and Core, Skin, and Muscle Temperature during Nitrous Oxide—Isoflurane Anesthesia in HumansAnesthesiology, 1989
- Mivacurium-induced Neuromuscular Blockade Following Single Bolus Doses and with Continuous Infusion during Either Balanced or Enflurane AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1989
- Clinical Pharmacology of Doxacurium Chloride A New Long-acting Nondepolarlzlng Muscle RelaxantAnesthesiology, 1988
- The Neuromuscular Blocking and Cardiovascular Effects of Doxacurium Chloride in Patients Receiving Nitrous Oxide Narcotic AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1988