Evaluation of alternative methods of cervical cancer screening for resource-poor settings
Open Access
- 15 August 2000
- Vol. 89 (4) , 826-833
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20000815)89:4<826::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-5
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noncytologic methods of screening for cervical carcinoma and its precursor lesions are needed for resource‐poor settings in which cervical carcinoma continues to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality. METHODS Two thousand nine hundred forty‐four women ages 35–65 years were recruited from Cape Town, South Africa and screened using a combination of a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, direct visual inspection after the application of a 5% acetic acid solution (DVI), and cervicography. Cervicography was considered primarily as a method with which to quality control the DVI examinations. Women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) or carcinoma on Pap smear, positive DVI examination (acetowhite lesion or cervical ulcer/growth), high levels of high risk HPV DNA (relative light units [RLU] > 10× positive control), or positive Cervigram™ were referred for colposcopy and cervical biopsy. RESULTS Pap smears were positive in 8.1% of all women screened and identified 65 (78%) of all cases of biopsy confirmed high grade disease (high grade SIL or invasive carcinoma). DVI and cervicography were classified as positive in 18.1% and 10.5%, respectively, of women screened and identified 58 (67%) and 46 (58%) of all cases of high grade disease, respectively. The results of HPV DNA testing varied depending on the cutoff value used to define a positive result. At the standard cutoff level (RLU > 1× positive control), 16.2% of women screened were classified as high risk HPV DNA positive, as were 63 women with high grade disease (73%). CONCLUSIONS DVI and HPV DNA testing identified similar numbers of high grade SIL (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 2,3) and invasive carcinoma cases as Pap smears. However, both classify considerably more women without cervical disease as being test positive. Cancer 2000;89:826–33. © 2000 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vinegar and visual inspection used to detect cervical cancerPublished by BMJ ,1999
- Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical-cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care settingThe Lancet, 1999
- Visual inspection with acetic acid in the early detection of cervical cancer and precursorsInternational Journal of Cancer, 1999
- Visual inspection of the uterine cervix after the application of acetic acid in the detection of cervical carcinoma and its precursorsCancer, 1998
- Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verifiedJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Acetic acid visualization of the cervix: an alternative to cytologic screeningObstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Precancerous Lesions of the CervixPublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985International Journal of Cancer, 1993
- The bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: Report of the 1991 bethesda workshopHuman Pathology, 1992
- COMPARING NEW AND OLD SCREENING TESTS WHEN A REFERENCE PROCEDURE CANNOT BE PERFORMED ON ALL SCREENEESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987