Forgoing Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment in Abused Children
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 106 (5) , 1151-1153
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.5.1151
Abstract
A decision to forgo life-sustaining medical treatment (LSMT) for a critically ill child injured as the result of abuse should be made using the same criteria as those used for any critically ill child. The parent or guardian of an abused child may have a conflict of interest when a decision to forgo LSMT risks changing the legal charge faced by a parent, guardian, relative, or acquaintance from assault to manslaughter or homicide. If a physician suspects that a parent or guardian is not acting in a child's best interest, further review and consultation should be sought in hopes of resolving the conflict. A guardian ad litem who will represent the child's interests regarding LSMT should be appointed in all cases in which a parent or guardian may have a conflict of interest.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Palliative Care for ChildrenPediatrics, 2000
- Ethics and the Care of Critically Ill Infants and ChildrenPediatrics, 1996
- Successful organ donation in victims of child abuseClinical Transplantation, 1995
- The Role of an Ethics Committee in Resolving Conflict in the Neonatal Intensive Care UnitJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1995
- Impact of Medical Examiner/Coroner Practices on Organ Recovery in the United StatesJAMA, 1994
- Caring for Gravely Ill ChildrenPediatrics, 1994
- Brain death in pediatric intensive care unit patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1994
- Ethics and the provision of futile, harmful, or burdensome treatment to childrenCritical Care Medicine, 1992