Prediction of Virological Response to Lopinavir/Ritonavir Using the Genotypic Inhibitory Quotient
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
- Vol. 20 (3) , 275-278
- https://doi.org/10.1089/088922204322996509
Abstract
The predictive value of virological response to lopinavir (LPV)/ritonavir (r) was assessed in 126 HIV-infected patients who failed antiretroviral therapy and had begun a rescue intervention based on LPV/r. At 3 months, subjects with ≤6 protease (PRO) resistance mutations showed a higher rate of virological response (HIV-RNA drop > 1 log or to 6 PRO resistance mutations (77% versus 48%; p = 0.01). On the other hand, virological responders had greater mean LPV plasma trough levels than nonresponders (6.4 versus 3.9 μg/ml; p = 0.02). A positive correlation was found between LPV trough concentration and viral load reductions at 3 months under LPV/r (r = 0.23; p = 0.017). Overall, virological response was seen in 80.8% of patients with LPV trough levels >4.8 μg/ml while in only 52.5% of patients with lower LPV trough concentrations (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, both ≤6 PRO resistance mutations and LPV trough levels >4.8 μg/ml were independent predictors of virological response to salvage therapy with LPV/r. A genotypic inhibitory quotient (GIQ) was estimated for each patient based on the ratio between LPV trough levels and the number of PRO resistance mutations. A positive strong correlation was found between GIQ and viral load reductions (r = 0.42; p = 0.002). Virological response was seen in 78% of patients with a GIQ >0.7 but only in 41.6% of those with lower GIQ (p = 0.004). When LPV trough levels >4.8 μg/ml, PRO resistance mutations ≤6, and GIQ >0.7 were all included in a stepwise multivariate analysis, GIQ remained as the main independent predictor of response to LPV/r.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genotypic Inhibitory Quotient as Predictor of Virological Response to Ritonavir-Amprenavir in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor-Experienced PatientsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2003
- Virtual Inhibitory Quotient Predicts Response to Ritonavir Boosting of Indinavir-Based Therapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients with Ongoing ViremiaAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Clinical use of lopinavir/ritonavir in a salvage therapy settingAIDS, 2002
- Impact of HIV genotyping and drug levels on the response to salvage therapy with saquinavir/ritonavirAIDS, 2002
- Salvage Treatment with Lopinavir/Ritonavir (Kaletra) in HIV-Infected Patients Failing All Current Antiretroviral Drug FamiliesHIV Research & Clinical Practice, 2002
- High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for the Simultaneous Determination of the Six HIV-Protease Inhibitors and Two Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Human PlasmaTherapeutic Drug Monitoring, 2002
- Safety and Antiviral Activity at 48 Weeks of Lopinavir/Ritonavir plus Nevirapine and 2 Nucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitors in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Protease Inhibitor–Experienced PatientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- ABT-378/ritonavir plus stavudine and lamivudine for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48-week resultsAIDS, 2001
- Efficacy and safety of twice daily first-line ritonavir/indinavir plus double nucleoside combination therapy in HIV-infected individualsAIDS, 2000
- CD4-cell count in HIV-1-infected individuals remaining viraemic with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)The Lancet, 1998