Glycemic Control From 1988 to 2000 Among U.S. Adults Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 27 (1) , 17-20
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.27.1.17
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To describe the changes in demographics, antidiabetic treatment, and glycemic control among the prevalent U.S. adult diagnosed type 2 diabetes population between the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988–1994) and the initial release of NHANES 1999–2000. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The study population was derived from NHANES III (n = 1,215) and NHANES 1999–2000 (n = 372) subjects who reported a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes with available data on diabetes medication and HbA1c. Four therapeutic regimens were defined: diet only, insulin only, oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) only, or OADs plus insulin. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine changes in antidiabetic regimens and glycemic control rates over time, adjusted for demographic and clinical risk factors. The outcome measure for glycemic control was HbA1c. Glycemic control rates were defined as the proportion of type 2 diabetic patients with HbA1c level <7%. RESULTS—Dietary treatment in individuals with diabetes decreased as the sole therapy from 27.4 to 20.2% between the surveys. Insulin use also decreased from 24.2 to 16.4%, while those on OADs only increased from 45.4 to 52.5%. Combination of OADs and insulin increased from 3.1 to 11.0%. Glycemic control rates declined from 44.5% in NHANES III (1988–1994) to 35.8% in NHANES 1999–2000. CONCLUSIONS—Treatment regimens among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes have changed substantially over the past 10 years. However, a decrease in glycemic control rates was also observed during this time period. This trend may contribute to increased rates of macrovascular and microvascular diabetic complications, which may impact health care costs. Our data support the public health message of implementation of early, aggressive management of diabetes.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2002Diabetes Care, 2003
- Association of Younger Age With Poor Glycemic Control and Obesity in Urban African Americans With Type 2 DiabetesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2003
- Glycemic Control With Diet, Sulfonylurea, Metformin, or Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusProgressive Requirement for Multiple Therapies (UKPDS 49)JAMA, 1999
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)The Lancet, 1998
- Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 1998
- A Comprehensive Assessment of the Avoidability of Long-Term Complications of Diabetes. A case-control study. SID-AMD Italian Study Group for the Implementation of the St. Vincent DeclarationDiabetes Care, 1996
- Efficacy of Insulin and Sulfonylurea Combination Therapy in Type II DiabetesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Efficacy of insulin and sulfonylurea combination therapy in type II diabetes. A meta-analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled trialsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Optimizing Blood Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes: an Approach Based on Fasting Blood Glucose MeasurementsDiabetic Medicine, 1988