Exposure to Ambient and Nonambient Components of Particulate Matter
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Epidemiology
- Vol. 16 (3) , 396-405
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000158918.57071.3e
Abstract
Numerous epidemiologic studies report associations between outdoor concentrations of particles and adverse health effects. Because personal exposure to particles is frequently dominated by exposure to nonambient particles (those originating from indoor sources), we present an approach to evaluate the relative impacts of ambient and nonambient exposures. We developed separate estimates of exposures to ambient and nonambient particles of different size ranges (PM2.5, PM10–2.5 and PM10) based on time-activity data and the use of particle sulfate measurements as a tracer for indoor infiltration of ambient particles. To illustrate the application of these estimates, associations between cardiopulmonary health outcomes and the estimated exposures were compared with associations computed using measurements of personal exposures and outdoor concentrations for a repeated-measures panel study of 16 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease conducted in the summer of 1998 in Vancouver. Total personal fine particle exposures were dominated by exposures to nonambient particles, which were not correlated with ambient fine particle exposures or ambient concentrations. Although total and nonambient particle exposures were not associated with any of the health outcomes, ambient exposures (and to a lesser extent ambient concentrations) were associated with decreased lung function, decreased systolic blood pressure, increased heart rate, and increased supraventricular ectopic heartbeats. Measures of heart rate variability showed less consistent relationships among the various exposure metrics. These results demonstrate the usefulness of separating total personal particle exposures into their ambient and nonambient components. The results support previous epidemiologic findings using ambient concentrations by demonstrating an association between health outcomes and ambient (outdoor origin) particle exposures but not with nonambient (indoor origin) particle exposures.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Receptor modeling of ambient and personal exposure samples: 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure StudyAtmospheric Environment, 2003
- Atmospheric Secondary Inorganic Particulate Matter: The Toxicological Perspective as a Basis for Health Effects Risk AssessmentInhalation Toxicology, 2003
- Relative Contribution of Outdoor and Indoor Particle Sources to Indoor ConcentrationsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2000
- Characterization of indoor particle sources: A study conducted in the metropolitan Boston area.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000
- What Do Epidemiologic Findings Tell Us about Health Effects of Environmental Aerosols?Journal of Aerosol Medicine, 2000
- Receptor Modeling Assessment of Particle Total Exposure Assessment Methodology DataEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1999
- Personal Exposure to Fine Particles in Children Correlates Closely with Ambient Fine ParticlesArchives of environmental health, 1999
- Ozone personal exposures and health effects for selected groups residing in the Fraser ValleyAtmospheric Environment, 1997
- Health effects of particulate air pollution: time for reassessment?Environmental Health Perspectives, 1995
- The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosolsAtmospheric Environment (1967), 1978