Bias in the one‐step method for pooling study results
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 9 (3) , 247-252
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780090307
Abstract
The one-step (Peto) method for obtaining pooled effect estimates can yield extremely biased results when applied to unbalanced data. Even for balanced studies, the one-step estimate may incorporate an unacceptable degree of bias. In place of the one-step estimate, we recommend use of ordinary Mantel-Haenszel, weighted least squares, or maximum likelihood estimates whenever the total number of events is adequate for such methods. If the total number of events is small, we recommend exact methods.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Asbestos Exposure and Gastrointestinal Malignancy Review and Meta‐AnalysisAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1988
- INTERPRETATION AND CHOICE OF EFFECT MEASURES IN EPIDEMIOLOGIC ANALYSES1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1Epidemiologic Reviews, 1987
- A GENERAL ESTIMATOR FOR THE VARIANCE OF THE MANTEL HAENSZEL ODDS RATIOAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1986
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- On the Large-Sample Distribution of the Mantel-Haenszel Odds-Ratio EstimatorPublished by JSTOR ,1983
- Generalized Linear ModelsPublished by Springer Nature ,1983
- MINIMUM EXPECTED CELL SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MANTEL-HAENSZEL ONE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM CHI-SQUARE TEST AND A RELATED RAPID PROCEDUREAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1980