A comparison between intravenous oxytocin and oral prostaglandin E2for the induction of labour in parous patients
- 1 January 1974
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 2 (4) , 236-239
- https://doi.org/10.1185/03007997409112313
Abstract
A prospective survey was carried out on 187 parous patients, in whom labour was induced by amniotomy and either intravenous oxytocin or oral prostaglandin E2, (PGE2). The results show no significant difference in the performance of each group for the induction to delivery interval, the mode of delivery, the Apgar score at 5 minutes or for third stage anomalies. The use of oral PGE2offers advantages to the patient who is spared the discomfort, restriction and minor risks associated with an intravenous infusion; and to the midwife who does not have to make frequent checks on the flow rate if an infusion pump is not available. The method also permits the ancillary equipment, which may well be in limited supply, to be reserved for more ‘at risk’ cases.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A COMPARISON OF ORAL PROSTAGLANDIN E2 AND INTRAVENOUS SYNTOCINON IN THE INDUCTION OF LABOURBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1973
- Oral prostaglandins and amniotomy.BMJ, 1972
- Amniotomy and Oral Prostaglandin E2 Titration for Induction of LabourBMJ, 1972
- Candida Endocarditis Treated with 5-FluorocytosineBMJ, 1971