Diagnosis of malignant ascites
- 1 July 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Vol. 33 (7) , 833-838
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01550972
Abstract
The ascitic fluid concentrations of cholesterol and fibronectin and the serum-ascites albumin difference were compared with two conventional tests of ascitic fluid, total protein and LDH, in their diagnostic ability for detection of malignancy in ascitic samples from 69 patients with ascites: 54 with ascites due to liver disease and 15 whose ascites was caused by peritoneal metastases. Sixteen cirrhotic patients with superimposed hepatocellular carcinoma in whom ascites was of uncertain etiology were considered separately. The mean ascitic fluid total protein, LDH, cholesterol, and fibronectin values in the peritoneal metastases group were 3.70±1.20 g/dl, 247.26±148.14 units/liter, 109. 06±29.85 mg/dl, and 91.57±41.52 μg/ml, respectively, and all were significantly higher than the corresponding values in the liver disease group (P<0.001), which were 1.37±0.59 g/dl, 75.40±110.70 units/liter, 23.75±11.22 mg/dl, and 31.86±10.51 μg/ml,respectively. Mean serum-ascites albumin difference in the peritoneal metastases group was 0.62±0.38 g/dl, which was significantly different from the corresponding value in the liver disease group (1.92±0.41 g/dl, P <0.001). Both ascitic cholesterol above 46 mg/dl and an ascitic fibronectin concentration >50 μg/mlhad high diagnostic accuracy (97%) for malignancy, being higher than that achieved using a serum-ascites albumin difference under 1.1 g/dl and an ascitic total protein above 2.5 g/dl, which had accuracies of 94% and 93%, respectively. Ascitic fluid LDH was the least reliable test. No differences in the ascitic fluid analysis were found between cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma. We conclude that both ascitic cholesterol and ascitic fibronectin are clinically more accurate than the serum-ascites albumin difference, ascitic total protein,and ascitic LDH in the diagnosis of malignant ascites. Of these tests, the determination of ascitic cholesterol may be the preferred one because of its simplicity and cost effectiveness.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Value of Ascitic Lipids in the Differentiation Between Cirrhotic and Malignant AscitesHepatology, 1986
- Measurement of Fibronectin in Human Body Fluidscclm, 1986
- The Diagnosis of Bacterial Peritonitis: Comparison of Ph, Lactate Concentration and Leukocyte CountHepatology, 1985
- White Count, Ph and Lactate in Ascites in the Diagnosis of Spontaneous Bacterial PeritonitisHepatology, 1985
- FIBRONECTIN, A MARKER FOR MALIGNANT ASCITESThe Lancet, 1984
- Superiority of the serum-ascites albumin difference over the ascites total protein concentration in separation of “transudative” and “exudative” ascitesThe American Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Crosslinked fibrin derivatives and fibronectin in ascitic fluid from patients with ovarian cancer compared to ascitic fluid in liver cirrhosisThrombosis Research, 1984
- Carcinoembryonic antigen titers on effusion fluid. A diagnostic tool?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1977
- High protein ascites in patients with uncomplicated hepatic cirrhosisThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1974
- Diagnostic Value of the Estimation of Glucose in Ascitic FluidDigestion, 1973