Efficacy endpoint selection and multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials with inherent multiple endpoint issues
- 19 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (20) , 3133-3150
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1557
Abstract
The ideal approach for the design and analysis of clinical trials is to select a single primary endpoint that provides a complete characterization of the disease under study and permits an efficient evaluation of the effect of a test drug. However, this is often not possible for a number of diseases or clinical trials. This paper examines some practical clinical decision‐making scenarios for the selection and analysis of efficacy outcome measures in clinical trials with inherent multiplicity components. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcutJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1999
- Multiple Testings: Multiple Comparisons and Multiple EndpointsDrug Information Journal, 1998
- Discussion: On the role and analysis of secondary outcomes in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1997
- A reviewer's perspective on multiple endpoint issues in clinical trialsJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1997
- A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni inequalityBiometrika, 1990
- An approximate likelihood ratio test for a normal mean vector with nonnegative components with application to clinical trialsBiometrika, 1989
- A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significanceBiometrika, 1988
- A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni testBiometrika, 1988
- An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significanceBiometrika, 1986
- On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of varianceBiometrika, 1976