USING NEUTRALIZING ROUTINES TO REDUCE PROBLEM BEHAVIORS
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 30 (4) , 601-614
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1997.30-601
Abstract
Establishing operations can alter problem behaviors by changing the momentary value of reinforcers associated with those problem behaviors. If establishing operations (EOs) precede the presentation of discriminative stimuli (SDs) for problem behaviors, it may be possible to introduce neutralizing routines that both reduce the value of reinforcers associated with problem behaviors and decrease the occurrence of problem behaviors. The present study examined this logic with 3 adolescents with severe intellectual disabilities. Initial functional analyses indicated that problem behaviors were motivated by either escape or tangible items. Functional assessment interviews identified possible establishing operations that were associated with the occurrence of problem behavior and indicated that these establishing operations occurred over 1 hr before presentation of the SD for problem behaviors. We used an alternating treatments design to examine problem behaviors during instruction under four conditions: EO + SD, SD only, EO only, and neither SD nor EO. For all 3 participants, problem behaviors occurred almost exclusively during the EO + SD condition. A further analysis compared the EO + SD condition when neutralizing routines were embedded between the EO and the SD. Results from an ABAB reversal design supported the effectiveness of neutralizing routines to reduce these problem behaviors. Applied and theoretical implications are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavioral Support for Students with Severe DisabilitiesThe Journal of Special Education, 1997
- SLEEP DEPRIVATION, ALLERGY SYMPTOMS, AND NEGATIVELY REINFORCED PROBLEM BEHAVIORJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1996
- LIMITED MATCHING ON CONCURRENT‐SCHEDULE REINFORCEMENT OF ACADEMIC BEHAVIORJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1994
- TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURYJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1994
- EFFECTS OF SETTING EVENTS ON THE PROBLEM BEHAVIOR OF STUDENTS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIESJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1993
- Establishing operations and the mandThe Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 1988
- DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTIONS OF STIMULIJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982
- Some Contextual Determinants of Stimulus Potency11The author of this paper wishes to thank Laura Rosenthal and Danielle spiegler for their dedicated editorial assistance and constructive suggestions in the preparation of this report. Dr. Donald M. Baer's suggestions helped to improve an early version of this paper. The opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the positions of the National Institute of Mental Health.Published by Elsevier ,1972
- A COMPARISON OF PROCEDURES FOR ELIMINATING SELF‐INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR OF RETARDED ADOLESCENTS1Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971
- Child development, Vol 1: A systematic and empirical theory.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1961