The exclusive economic zone and antarctica: The dilemmas of non‐sovereign jurisdiction
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ocean Development & International Law
- Vol. 19 (6) , 469-491
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00908328809545874
Abstract
Antarctica is the only continent from which no exclusive economic zones extend. This article examines the EEZ as a legal concept, particularly its relevance for enhancing maritime jurisdiction offshore Antarctica. The study analyzes the political setting in the Antarctic which would affect creation of EEZs in the region, especially the division of the continent into sector claims by certain states and the implications presented by various island groups in the area. An appraisal is made of the legal situation and the jurisdictional opportunities afforded by the Antarctic Treaty System. The author concludes that a recognized political authority, with demonstrated legal competence and capabilities, is administering jurisdictional considerations in the Antarctic area. In its operation, this Antarctic Treaty regime fulfills management and conservation functions analogous to those of EEZs in waters offshore the continent.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The evolving antarctic minerals regimeOcean Development & International Law, 1988
- The Antarctic Minerals Negotiating ProcessAmerican Journal of International Law, 1987
- Antarctic implications of the new law of the seaOcean Development & International Law, 1986
- The Soviet Union and the Antarctic RegimeAmerican Journal of International Law, 1984
- Convention on the conservation of antarctic marine living resourcesOcean Development & International Law, 1983
- Antarctica and the law of the sea: An introductory overviewOcean Development & International Law, 1983
- Conflict over the Cold ContinentForeign Policy, 1979
- Antarctic Treaty Signatories: Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic SealsInternational Legal Materials, 1972
- Rights Over the ArcticAmerican Journal of International Law, 1930