Gene organisation determines evolution of function in the chicken MHC
- 1 February 1999
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Immunological Reviews
- Vol. 167 (1) , 101-117
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065x.1999.tb01385.x
Abstract
Summary: Some years ago, we used our data for class I genes, proteins and peptide‐binding specificities to develop the hypothesis that the chicken B‐F/B‐L region represents a “minimal essential MHC”, In this view, the B locus contains the classical (highly expressed and polymorphic) class I α and class II β multigene families, which are reduced to one or two members, with many other genes moved away or deleted from the chicken genome altogether. We found that a single dominantly expressed class I gene determines the immune response to certain infectious pathogens, due to peptide‐binding specificity and cell‐surface expression level. This stands in stark contrast to well‐studied mammals like humans and mice, in which every haplotype is more‐or‐less responsive to every pathogen and vaccine, presumably due to the multigene family of MHC molecules present. In order to approach the basis for a single dominantly expressed class I molecule, we have sequenced a portion of the B complex and examined the location and polymorphism of the class I (B‐F)α, TAP and class II (B‐L) β genes. The region is remarkably compact and simple, with many of the genes expected from the MHC of mammals absent, including LMP, class II α and DO genes as well as most class III region genes. However, unexpected genes were present, including tapasin and putative natural killer receptor genes. The region is also organised differently from mammals, with the TAPs in between the class I genes, the tapasin gene in between the class II (B‐L) β genes, and the C4 gene outside of the class I α and class II β genes. The close proximity of TAP and class I α genes leads to the possibility of co‐evolution, which can drive the use of a single dominantly expressed class I molecule with peptide‐binding specificity like the TAP molecule. There is also a single dominantly expressed class II β gene, but the reason for this is not yet clear. Finally, the presence of the C4 gene outside of the classical class I α and class II β genes suggests the possibility that this organisation was ancestral, although a number of models of organization and evolution are still possible, given the presence of the Rfp‐γ region with non‐classical class I α and class II β genes as well as the presence of multigene families of B‐G and rRNA genes.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- The importance of MHC for Rous sarcoma virus and Marek's disease virus—Some Payne‐ful considerationsAvian Pathology, 1998
- Co-evolution of rat TAP transporters and MHC class I RT1-A moleculesCurrent Biology, 1998
- Chicken genome mapping: a new era in avian geneticsTrends in Genetics, 1995
- Map of the human MHCImmunology Today, 1993
- Chicken major histocompatibility complex class II B genes: analysis of interallelic and inter-locus sequence varianceEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1993
- DNA sequence analysis of 66 kb of the human MHC class II region encoding a cluster of genes for antigen processingJournal of Molecular Biology, 1992
- A preliminary linkage map of the chicken genomeGenomics, 1992
- Common West African HLA antigens are associated with protection from severe malariaNature, 1991
- Origin of major histocompatibility complex polymorphism: The trans-species hypothesisHuman Immunology, 1987
- Relationship of Blood Type to Histocompatibility in ChickensScience, 1961