To Hedge or Not Against an Uncertain Climate Future?
- 15 October 2004
- journal article
- policy forum
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 306 (5695) , 416-417
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101170
Abstract
The economically based study reported in this Policy Forum uses a modified DICE-99 modeling structure to explore the relative efficacy of implementing near-term mitigation policies as a hedge against model, calibration, and implementation uncertainties about temperature targets and climate sensitivity. Implementing modest mitigation over the near term minimizes the expected cost of selecting equally likely temperature targets in 2035 across a recently calibrated probability distribution for climate sensitivity that extends up to 9ºC. Hedging effectively "buys insurance" against future adjustment costs and is extremely robust across most possible futures, especially when compared with a wait-and-see strategy that would eschew mitigation over the first third of this century.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemispheric and Large-Scale Surface Air Temperature Variations: An Extensive Revision and an Update to 2001Journal of Climate, 2003
- Objective estimation of the probability density function for climate sensitivityJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001
- Robust Strategies for Abating Climate ChangeClimatic Change, 2000
- Exercises in hedging against extreme consequences of global change and the expected value of information1Global Environmental Change, 1996
- To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of The Greenhouse EffectThe Economic Journal, 1991