Impacts of Responsive Load in PJM: Load Shifting and Real Time Pricing
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Energy Journal
- Vol. 29 (2) , 101-122
- https://doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol29-no2-6
Abstract
In PJM, 15% of electric generation capacity ran less than 96 hours, 1.1% of the time, over 2006. If retail prices reflected hourly wholesale market prices, customers would shift consumption away from peak hours and installed capacity could drop. We use PJM data to estimate consumer and producer savings from a change toward real-time pricing (RTP) or time-of-use (TOU) pricing. Surprisingly, neither RTP nor TOU has much effect on average price under plausible short-term consumer responses. Consumer plus producer surplus rises 2.8%-4.4% with RTP and 0.6%-1.0% with TOU. Peak capacity savings are seven times larger with RTP. Peak load drops by 10.4%-17.7% with RTP and only 1.1%-2.4% with TOU. Half of all possible customer savings from load shifting are obtained by shifting only 1.7% of all MWh to another time of day, indicating that only the largest customers need be responsive to get the majority of the short-run savings.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impacts of Responsive Load in PJM: Load Shifting and Real Time PricingThe Energy Journal, 2008
- Customer Response to RTP in Competitive Markets: A Study of Niagara Mohawk’s Standard Offer TariffThe Energy Journal, 2007
- The Short-Run Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity MarketsThe Energy Journal, 2006
- The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity PricingThe Energy Journal, 2005
- A Survey of Utility Experience with Real Time PricingPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,2004
- Demand-side reserve offers in joint energy/reserve electricity marketsIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2003