Depth Perception of Surfaces in Pictures: Looking for Conventions of Depiction in Pandora's Box
- 1 February 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 12 (1) , 5-20
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p120005
Abstract
The perception of depth in monocularly viewed pictures has been investigated with the use of a binocular rangefinder developed by Gregory. Two experiments are reported which focus upon stimulus conditions that were identified by Haber as conventions for rendering depth in pictures. Several conclusions, which concern assumptions that must be made in interpreting pictures according to such conventions, are supported by the results. There is a default or assumed layout of background space. The interpretation of a point in a depiction depends upon the interpretation of neighboring points, so that interpretations of local features influence the interpretations of nearby ‘empty’ areas. In photographs, the magnitude of apparent depth depends upon the degree of discrepancy between the position of the illuminating source and the observer's supposed light-source position. Also in photographs, apparent depth increases as the contrast between highlights and attached shadows increases.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Light Source Position in the Perception of Object ShapePerception, 1983
- ART AND PERCEPTIONPublished by Elsevier ,1978
- Visual Detection of Line Segments: An Object-Superiority EffectScience, 1974
- Sight and MindOptometry and Vision Science, 1974
- Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysisPerception & Psychophysics, 1973
- Hudson's Pictures in Pandora's BoxJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1970
- Ueber eine optische Inversion bei Betrachtung verkehrter, durch optische Vorrichtung entworfener, physischer BilderAnnalen der Physik, 1858
- Ueber ein Anaglyptoskop (Vorrichtung, vertiefte Formen erhaben zu sehen)Annalen der Physik, 1856
- XLII.—On the Conversion of Relief by Inverted VisionTransactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 1844
- Explanation of an Optical DeceptionTransactions of the American Philosophical Society, 1786