Corticomotoneuronal Postspike Effects in Shoulder, Elbow, Wrist, Digit, and Intrinsic Hand Muscles During a Reach and Prehension Task
- 1 October 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 80 (4) , 1961-1980
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.1961
Abstract
McKiernan, Brian J., Joanne K. Marcario, Jennifer Hill Karrer, and Paul D. Cheney. Corticomotoneuronal postspike effects in shoulder, elbow, wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand muscles during a reach and prehension task. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 1961–1980, 1998. We used spike-triggered averaging of rectified electromyographic activity to determine whether corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells produce postspike effects in muscles of both proximal and distal forelimb joints in monkeys performing a reach and prehension task. Two monkeys were trained to perform a self-paced task in which they reached forward from a starting position to retrieve a food reward from a small cylindrical well. We compiled spike-triggered averages from 22 to 24 separate forelimb muscles at both proximal (shoulder, elbow) and distal (wrist, digits, intrinsic hand) joints. Of 174 cells examined, 112 produced postspike effects in at least one of the target muscles. Of those cells, 45.5% produced postspike effects in both proximal and distal forelimb muscles. A nearly equal number (44.7%) produced postspike effects in distal muscles only, whereas a clear minority (9.8%) produced postspike effects in only proximal muscles. The majority of CM cells (71.4%) produced effects in two or more muscles, with an average muscle field of 3.1 ± 2.1 (mean ± SD) for facilitation plus suppression. Of 345 postspike effects identified, 70.7% were facilitation effects and 29.3% were suppression effects. The large majority of effects (72.2%) were in distal muscles. When averaged by joint, the latency and peak magnitude of postspike facilitation showed a stepwise increase from proximal to distal joints. The results of this study show that the majority of CM cells engaged in coordinated forelimb reaching movements facilitate and/or suppress muscles at multiple joints, including muscles at both proximal and distal joints. The results also show that CM cells make more frequent and more potent terminations in motoneuron pools of distal compared with proximal muscles.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distribution and Characteristics of Poststimulus Effects in Proximal and Distal Forelimb Muscles From Red Nucleus in the MonkeyJournal of Neurophysiology, 1998
- A low-cost, multi-channel, EMG signal processing amplifierJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 1998
- The influence of single monkey cortico‐motoneuronal cells at different levels of activity in target muscles.The Journal of Physiology, 1994
- Chapter 11 Neural mechanisms underlying corticospinal and rubrospinal control of limb movementsPublished by Elsevier ,1991
- Selective facilitation of different hand muscles by single corticospinal neurones in the conscious monkey.The Journal of Physiology, 1986
- Comparable patterns of muscle facilitation evoked by individual corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and by single intracortical microstimuli in primates: evidence for functional groups of CM cellsJournal of Neurophysiology, 1985
- Projection of individual pyramidal tract neurons to lumbar motor nuclei of the monkeyExperimental Brain Research, 1979
- Further study on the excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulationExperimental Brain Research, 1976
- Topographical organization of cortical efferent zones projecting to distal forelimb muscles in the monkeyExperimental Brain Research, 1972
- The distribution of monosynaptic excitation from the pyramidal tract and from primary spindle afferents to motoneurones of the baboon's hand and forearmThe Journal of Physiology, 1968