General Rules for Predicting Where a Catalytic Reaction Should Occur on Metal Surfaces: A Density Functional Theory Study of C−H and C−O Bond Breaking/Making on Flat, Stepped, and Kinked Metal Surfaces
Top Cited Papers
- 22 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Vol. 125 (7) , 1958-1967
- https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0207551
Abstract
To predict where a catalytic reaction should occur is a fundamental issue scientifically. Technologically, it is also important because it can facilitate the catalyst's design. However, to date, the understanding of this issue is rather limited. In this work, two types of reactions, CH4 ↔ CH3 + H and CO ↔ C + O on two transition metal surfaces, were chosen as model systems aiming to address in general where a catalytic reaction should occur. The dissociations of CH4 → CH3 + H and CO → C + O and their reverse reactions on flat, stepped, and kinked Rh and Pd surfaces were studied in detail. We find the following: First, for the CH4 ↔ Ch3 + H reaction, the dissociation barrier is reduced by ∼0.3 eV on steps and kinks as compared to that on flat surfaces. On the other hand, there is essentially no difference in barrier for the association reaction of CH3 + H on the flat surfaces and the defects. Second, for the CO ↔ C + O reaction, the dissociation barrier decreases dramatically (more than 0.8 eV on Rh and Pd) on steps and kinks as compared to that on flat surfaces. In contrast to the CH3 + H reaction, the C + O association reaction also preferentially occurs on steps and kinks. We also present a detailed analysis of the reaction barriers in which each barrier is decomposed quantitatively into a local electronic effect and a geometrical effect. Our DFT calculations show that surface defects such as steps and kinks can largely facilitate bond breaking, while whether the surface defects could promote bond formation depends on the individual reaction as well as the particular metal. The physical origin of these trends is identified and discussed. On the basis of our results, we arrive at some simple rules with respect to where a reaction should occur: (i) defects such as steps are always favored for dissociation reactions as compared to flat surfaces; and (ii) the reaction site of the association reactions is largely related to the magnitude of the bonding competition effect, which is determined by the reactant and metal valency. Reactions with high valency reactants are more likely to occur on defects (more structure-sensitive), as compared to reactions with low valency reactants. Moreover, the reactions on late transition metals are more likely to proceed on defects than those on the early transition metals.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- CH 4 dissociation on Ru(0001): A view from both sides of the barrierThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 2002
- Dissociative Adsorption of Dinitrogen on a Multipromoted Iron-Based Ammonia Synthesis Catalyst: Linking Properties of Catalysts and Single-Crystal SurfacesJournal of Catalysis, 2001
- Why Must Oxygen Atoms Be Activated from Hollow Sites to Bridge Sites in Catalytic CO Oxidation?Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2000
- Structure sensitivity of methane dissociation on palladium single crystal surfacesThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1997
- Ab initio chemisorption studies of methyl on nickel(111)Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1991
- Dynamics of the activated dissociative chemisorption of CH4 and implication for the pressure gap in catalysis: A molecular beam–high resolution electron energy loss studyThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1987
- A theoretical model of metal surface reactionsThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1983
- The kinetic isotope effect in the dissociative chemisorption of methaneThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1976
- The activated, dissociative chemisorption of methane on tungstenThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1975
- Mechanism Studies of the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis: The Incorporation of Radioactive Ethylene, Propionaldehyde and PropanolJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1960