Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Cardiac Events and Midterm Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Pure Aortic Stenosis
- 31 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 113 (4) , 570-576
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.587022
Abstract
Background— Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) occurs when the effective orifice area (EOA) of the prosthesis being implanted is too small in relation to body size, thus causing abnormally high transvalvular pressure gradients. The objective of this study was to examine the midterm impact of PPM on overall mortality and cardiac events after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Methods and Results— The indexed EOA (EOAi) was estimated for each type and size of prosthesis being implanted in 315 consecutive patients with pure aortic stenosis. PPM was defined as an EOAi ≤0.80 cm 2 /m 2 and was correlated with overall mortality and cardiac events. PPM was present in 47% of patients. The 5-year overall survival and cardiac event-free survival were 82±3% and 75±4%, respectively, in patients with PPM compared with 93±3% and 87±4% in patients with no PPM ( P ≤0.01). In multivariate analysis, PPM was associated with a 4.2-fold (95% CI, 1.6 to 11.3) increase in the risk of overall mortality and 3.2-fold (95% CI, 1.5 to 6.8) increase in the risk of cardiac events. The other independent risk factors were history of heart failure, NHYA class III-IV, severe left ventricular hypertrophy, and absence of normal sinus rhythm before operation. Conclusions— PPM is an independent predictor of cardiac events and midterm mortality in patients with pure aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement. As opposed to other risk factors, PPM may be avoided or its severity may be reduced with the use of a preventive strategy at the time of operation.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacementThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
- Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Short-Term Mortality After Aortic Valve ReplacementCirculation, 2003
- Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevantThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its preventionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important?The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprosthesesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve positionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Valve prosthesis hemodynamics and the problem of high transprosthetic pressure gradientsEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1992
- Validation of applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Valve prosthesis--patient mismatch. A long-term sequela.Heart, 1981