No Effect of Social Competition on Sham Dustbathing in Furnished Cages for Laying Hens
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A — Animal Science
- Vol. 52 (4) , 253-256
- https://doi.org/10.1080/090647002762381131
Abstract
Furnished cages equipped with a nest, a perch and a dustbath have been developed in response to the demand for improved hen welfare in combination with retained profit in egg production. However, the desired welfare improvement requires that the resources are provided in such a way that the hens can use them. Sham dustbathing behaviour on the wire floor is common in furnished cages despite the presence of a dustbath with litter and we tested the hypothesis that such sham dustbathing may be a result of social competition for limited dustbathing space. No support for this hypothesis was found since very little sham dustbathing took place when the dustbath was occupied by another hen. The findings are discussed in the light of previous research on the effect of early experience.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dust-bathing in the domestic fowl — diurnal rhythm and dust deprivationPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Why do hens sham dustbathe when they have litter?Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2002
- Dustbathing in modified battery cages: Is sham dustbathing an adequate substitute?Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 1997
- Pecking and Scratching in the Development of Dust Perception in Young ChicksActa Veterinaria Brno, 1996
- The relative preferences for feathers, straw, wood-shavings and sand for dustbathing, pecking and scratching in domestic chicksApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 1995
- Causal factors controlling dustbathing in Burmese red junglefowl: some results and a modelAnimal Behaviour, 1993