Adequate cohort sizes for caries clinical trials
- 1 February 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
- Vol. 6 (1) , 30-35
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1978.tb01115.x
Abstract
Methods of determining cohort sizes were examined to determine their appropriateness for use in multi‐group caries clinical trials. The appropriate method to use depends on the type of trial being planned. It is shown that multiple comparison methods using certain Bonferonni type t‐statistics ought to be used in trials in which different levels or frequencies of application of known caries inhibitors are being tested. It is also demonstrated that using the F‐test procedure in the determination of cohort sizes can result in unacceptable low sensitivity levels being realized for the comparisons of primary concern. Tables are presented which can be used to determine group sizes needed to achieve specified sensitivity levels for two‐group trials and multi‐group trials.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- XXXIV. The other side of ‘statistical significance’: alpha, beta. delta, and the calculation of sample sizeClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1975
- Planning a longitudinal study: I. Sample size determinationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1973
- A Procedure for Estimating Sample Size in Clinical Trials of Dental Caries PreventivesJournal of Dental Research, 1972
- Sample size requirements: one-way analysis of varianceBiometrika, 1970
- ESTIMATION OF SAMPLE SIZE FOR LONGITUDINAL CLINICAL CARIES TRIALS1967
- Multiple Comparisons among MeansJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1961
- Determination of Sample Size and Selection of Cases.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1959
- Power Function Charts for Specification of Sample Size in Analysis of VariancePsychometrika, 1958
- The Estimation of Sample Size in ExperimentsJournal of Dental Research, 1953