Diagnostic and prognostic characteristics of the enzyme linked immunosorbent rheumatoid factor assays in rheumatoid arthritis.
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 55 (3) , 157-161
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.55.3.157
Abstract
To determine the diagnostic and prognostic test qualities of the enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for rheumatoid factor isotypes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to compare them with the latex fixation test. Rheumatoid factor tests were performed in 1988 consecutive new rheumatology outpatients within two months after their first visit to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Rheumatology of Leiden University hospital. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and predictive values of the tests in discriminating RA from non-rheumatoid arthritis and erosive from non-erosive disease after two years of follow up were determined and presented as receiver operating characteristic curves and post-test probability curves. The sensitivity of the ELISA for IgG, IgA, and IgM rheumatoid factor for RA versus all controls at optimal cut off titres was 72%, 44%, and 69%, respectively; the specificity was 52%, 84%, and 86%. For the latex fixation test the sensitivity was 66% and the specificity 91%. The post-test probability of RA, at a clinical prevalence rate of 12%, given a positive test result in the ELISAs for IgG, IgA, and IgM rheumatoid factor and the latex fixation test, was 17%, 27%, 40%, and 49%, respectively; with negative test results the probability was 7%, 8%, 5%, and 5%, respectively. The specificity of all tests in discriminating erosive from non-erosive RA at two years was low: 41%, 44%, 47%, and 58% for the ELISAs for IgG, IgA, and IgM rheumatoid factor and the latex fixation test, respectively. The ELISAs for IgG and IgA rheumatoid factor are of no significance in diagnosing RA and in the prediction of erosive disease. The ELISA for IgM rheumatoid factor is a reasonable alternative for the latex fixation test when age and gender are taken in to consideration. The specificity of all rheumatoid factor tests in discriminating erosive from non-erosive RA is low.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is measurement of rheumatoid factor isotypes clinically useful?Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1993
- Clinical significance of rheumatoid factors in early rheumatoid arthritis: results of a follow up study.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1992
- The radiographic criterion in the 1987 revised criteria for rheumatoid arthritis. Reassessment in a prospective study of early diseaseArthritis & Rheumatism, 1992
- The latex test revisited. Rheumatoid factor testing in 8,287 rheumatic disease patientsArthritis & Rheumatism, 1991
- QUANTITATIVE DETECTION OF CLASS-SPECIFIC RHEUMATOID FACTORS USING MOUSE MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND THE BIOTIN/STREPTAVIDIN ENHANCEMENT SYSTEMRheumatology, 1989
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- Relation between bone erosions and rheumatoid factor isotypes.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1987
- IgM rheumatoid factor (RF), IgA RF, IgE RF, and IgG RF detected by ELISA in rheumatoid arthritis.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1987
- Prospective study of early rheumatoid arthritis. I. Prognostic value of IgA rheumatoid factor.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1984
- Quantitative aspects of the latex-fixation and Whaaler-Rose tests.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1970