A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 49 (3) , 279-284
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70001-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unsedated Peroral Endoscopy With a Video Ultrathin Endoscope: Patient Acceptance, Tolerance, and Diagnostic AccuracyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 1998
- A randomized trial of a 5.5mm V'S 9.5mm diameter videogastroscope in unsedated upper GI endoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- Peroral ultrathin endoscopy in adult patientsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGDGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- Prospective Comparison of Nasal Versus Oral Insertion of a Thin Video Endoscope in Healthy VolunteersEndoscopy, 1996
- The feasibility of upper gi endoscopy performed through the nose using thin videoendoscopeGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1996
- Throat Spray for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is Quite Acceptable to PatientsEndoscopy, 1996
- Unsedated trans-nasal pharyngoesophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD): TechniqueGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1994
- Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2000 examinationGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1989
- The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methodsPain, 1986