Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly Population: Disparities by Dual Medicare–Medicaid Enrollment Status
- 20 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Health Services Research
- Vol. 41 (6) , 2136-2154
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00585.x
Abstract
Objectives. To assess the disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening between elderly dual Medicare–Medicaid enrollees (or duals), the most vulnerable subgroup of the Medicare population, and nonduals. Data Sources/Study Setting. The 1999 Medicare Denominator File, the Medicare Outpatient Standard Analytic Files, and Physician Supplier Part B files. In addition, the 1998 Area Resource File was used as a source for county-level attributes. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. CRC screening procedures for 1999—fecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FLEX), colonoscopy with FOBT and/or FLEX (COL-WFF), and colonoscopy only (COL-ONLY)—were extracted from claim records, using diagnostic and procedure codes. Duals (n=2.5 million) and nonduals (n=20.2 million) receiving their care through the fee-for-service system were identified from the Denominator file. Hierarchical logistic regression analysis was conducted to adjust for individual- and county-level characteristics. Principal Findings. Compared with nonduals, duals were disproportionately represented by female, older-old, and minority individuals (respectively 74.4 versus 58.5 percent; 19.3 versus 10.8 percent; 35.7 versus 8.0 percent), and CRC screening was significantly lower in duals than in nonduals (5.1 versus 12.2 percent for FOBT adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.48, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–0.51); 0.7 versus 1.9 percent for FLEX, (AOR: 0.55, 95 percent CI: 0.49–0.61); 0.4 versus 0.8 percent for COL-WFF (AOR: 0.60, 95 percent CI: 0.54–0.67); and 1.8 versus 2.5 percent for COL-ONLY (AOR: 0.85, 95 percent CI: 0.80–0.89); p<.001 for all comparisons. Conclusions. Duals are significantly less likely than nonduals to undergo CRC screening, even after adjusting for individual- and county-level covariates. Future studies should evaluate the contribution of comorbidity and low socioeconomic status to these disparities.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2005CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2005
- A population‐based study of colorectal cancer test useCancer, 2004
- Sociodemographic differences in use of preventive services by women enrolled in Medicare+Choice plansPreventive Medicine, 2004
- Assessment of outcomes after colorectal cancer resection in the elderly as a rationale for screening and early detectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. populationCancer, 2004
- Racial disparities in the use of and indications for colorectal procedures in Medicare beneficiariesCancer, 2004
- Medicaid Enrollment among Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries: Individual Determinants, Effects of State Policy, and Impact on Service UseHealth Services Research, 2002
- How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care?Journal of Health Economics, 2002
- Does Managed Care Enable More Low Income Persons to Identify a Usual Source of Care?Medical Care, 2001
- Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United StatesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994