Effects of exogenous hexoses on bovine in vitro fertilized and cloned embryo development: Improved blastocyst formation after glucose replacement with fructose in a serum‐free culture medium

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To evaluate the embryotrophic role of three hexoses (glucose, fructose, and galactose), bovine embryos derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) or in vitro‐fertilization (IVF) were cultured in a modified synthetic oviductal fluid (mSOF), which contained either glucose (1.5 or 5.6 mM), fructose (1.5 or 5.6 mM), or galactose (1.5 or 5.6 mM). Compared to 1.5 mM glucose, use of 1.5 mM fructose significantly enhanced blastocyst formation in both SCNT (23 vs. 33%) and IVF embryos (26 vs. 34%), while 5.6 mM fructose did not improve blastocyst formation. Using 1.5 mM galactose did not improve blastocyst formation in SCNT embryos (22 vs. 23%), whereas it significantly inhibited blastocyst formation in IVF embryos (26 vs. 0%). In both SCNT and IVF embryos, 5.6 mM glucose or galactose significantly inhibited embryo development. In a second experiment, in glucose‐free mSOF, fructose at concentrations of 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, or 5.6 mM was able to support to morula (32–42 vs. 12%) and blastocyst formation (30–38 vs. 12%) compared to 0 mM fructose. In Experiment 3, addition of fructose (1.5, 3.0, or 5.6 mM) to mSOF containing 1.5 mM glucose did not further promote blastocyst formation in SCNT embryos compared with replacement with 1.5 mM fructose only. Replacement of glucose with 1.5 mM fructose significantly increased total blastomeres (143 vs. 123 cells) and trophectodermal (TE) cells (116 vs. 94 cells) and decreased inner cell mass (ICM) to TE cell ratio (0.24 vs. 0.31) in blastocysts, compared to 1.5 mM glucose. The combined addition of 1.5 mM fructose and glucose significantly increased ICM cell number (36.7 cells) and ICM/TE ratio (0.46). In conclusion, fructose might be a more efficient energy substrate than glucose for producing large number of transferable blastocysts derived from SCNT. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 65: 167–174, 2003.