A Tale of Two Kings: Alfred the Great and Æthelred the Unready
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Transactions of the Royal Historical Society
- Vol. 36, 195-217
- https://doi.org/10.2307/3679065
Abstract
IN the gallery of Anglo-Saxon kings, there are two whose characters are fixed in the popular imagination by their familiar epithets: Alfred the Great and ÆEthelred the Unready. Of course both epithets are products of the posthumous development of the kings' reputations (in opposite directions), not expressions of genuinely contemporary attitudes to the kings themselves: respective personalities. In the case of Alfred, it was the king’s own resourcefulness, courage and determination that brought the West Saxons through the Viking invasions, for it was these qualities, complemented by his concern for the well–being of his subjects, that inspired and maintained the people’s loyalty towards the king and generated their support for his cause. Whereas in the case of jEthelred, it was the king’s incompetence, weakness and vacillation that brought the kingdom to ruin, for it was these failings, exacerbated by his displays of cruelty and spite, that alienated the people and made them abandon his cause. Few historians, perhaps, would subscribe to such a view expressed as bluntly as that, and more, I suspect, would consider such comparisons to be futile and probably misconceived in the first place. I would maintain, however, that something is to be gained from the exercise of comparing the two kings in fairly broad terms: by juxtaposing discussions of the status of the main narrative accounts of each king’s reign we can more easily appreciate how their utterly different reputations arose, and see, moreover, that in certain respects the apparent contrast between them might actually be deceptive; by comparing the predicament in which each king was placed we can better understand how one managed to extricate himself from trouble while the other succumbed; and overall we can more readily judge how much, or how little, can be attributed to personal qualities or failings on the part of the kings themselves.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Settlement of Disputes in Early Medieval EuropePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- Monastic lands and England's defence in the Viking AgeThe English Historical Review, 1985
- The Practical Use of Vegetius’ De Re Militari During the Early Middle AgesThe Historian, 1985
- The collection of Danegeld and Heregeld in the reigns of Aethelred II and CnutThe English Historical Review, 1984
- The early section of the Worcester chronicleJournal of Medieval History, 1983
- REVIEWS OF BOOKSThe English Historical Review, 1981
- The Diplomas of King Æthelred ‘the Unready’ 978–1016Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1980
- Royal Acts of Mutilation: The Case Against Henry IAlbion, 1978
- ALFRED THE GREAT: PROPAGANDA AND TRUTHHistory, 1971
- Henry I and the beginnings of the Saxon empireThe English Historical Review, 1968