Difference limens for phase in normal and hearing-impaired subjects

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
These experiments measure the ability to detect a change in the relative phase of a single component in a harmonic complex tone. complex tones containing the first 20 harmonics of 50, 100, or 200 Hz, all at equal amplitude, were used. All of the harmonics except one started in cosine phase. The remaining harmonic started in cosine phase, but was shifted in phase half-way through either the first or the second of the two stimuli comprising a trial. The subject had to identify the stimulus containing the phase-shifted component. For normally hearing subjects tested at a level of 70 dB SPL per component, thresholds for detecting the phase shift [i.e., phase difference limens (DLs)] were smallest (2.degree.-4.degree.) for harmonics above the eighth and for the lowest fundamental frequency (F0). Changes in phase were not detectable for harmonic numbers below the three or four at the lowest F0 and below 5-13 at the highest F0. The DLs increased slightly for the highest harmonics in the complexes. The DLs increased markedly with decreasing level, except for the highest harmonic, where only a small effect of level was found. Subjects reported that the phase-shifted harmonic appeared to "pop out" and was heard with a pure-tone quality. A pitch-matching experiment demonstrated that the pitch of this tone corresponded to the frequency of the phase-shifted component. For the highest harmonic, the phase shift was associated with a downward shift of the edge pitch heard in the reference (all cosine phase) stimulus. When the phases of the components in the reference stimulus were randomized, phase DLs were much higher (and often impossible to measure), the pop-out phenomenon was not observed, and no edge pitch was heard. Subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing impairment generally showed poorer phase sensitivity in their impaired than in their normal ears, when the two ears were compared at equal sound-pressure levels. However, at comparable sensation levels, the impaired ears sometimes showed lower phase DLs. The results are explained by considering the waveforms that would occur at the outputs of the auditory filters in response to these stimuli.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: