Exact Type 1 Error Rates for Robustness of Student's t Test with Unequal Variances
- 1 December 1980
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Journal of Educational Statistics
- Vol. 5 (4) , 337-349
- https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986005004337
Abstract
It is noted that disagreements have arisen in the literature about the robustness of the t test in normal populations with unequal variances. Hsu's procedure is applied to determine exact Type I error rates for t. Employing fairly liberal but objective standards for assessing robustness, it is shown that the t test is not always robust to the assumption of equal population variances even when sample sizes are equal. Several guidelines are suggested including the point that to apply t at α = .05 without regard for unequal variances would require equal sample sizes of at least 15 by one of the standards considered. In many cases, especially those with unequal N's, an alternative such as Welch's procedure is recommended.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robustness?British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1978
- A comparison of the power of the U and t tests.Psychological Review, 1962
- The effects of violations of assumptions underlying the t test.Psychological Bulletin, 1960
- Bounds for the Variance of the Mann-Whitney StatisticThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1957
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1954
- NON-NORMALITY AND TESTS ON VARIANCESBiometrika, 1953
- Some Consequences When the Assumptions for the Analysis of Variance are not SatisfiedBiometrics, 1947
- THE GENERALIZATION OF ‘STUDENT'S’ PROBLEM WHEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT POPULATION VARLANCES ARE INVOLVEDBiometrika, 1947