A comparative study on the antitumor effect, cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of doxorubicin given as a bolus, continuous infusion or entrapped in liposomes in the Lou/M Wsl rat

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Liposome encapsulation of doxorubicin (DXR) has been shown to increase the therapeutic index of the drug in several animal systems. The prevention of peak plasma concentrations of free drug might be a major factor contributing to the beneficial effects resulting from liposome encapsulation. If so, the administration of DXR as a continuous infusion should also lead to an improved therapeutic index. In the present paper, the administration of liposome-encapsulated DXR is compared with the infusion of DXR with regard to their potential to preserve antitumor activity, enhance survival and reduce cardiomyo- and nephropathy in IgM immunocytoma-bearing Lou/M Wsl rats. Plasma concentrations of DXR were determined to correlate the biological results with pharmacokinetic parameters. Liposomes containing phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine and cholesterol (extrusion-multilamellar vesicles) were used. Bolus injections of free DXR (free DXR) and DXR liposomes (lip-DXR) in a multiple-dose regimen were compared with 24-h infusions of the same cumulative doses of DXR (inf-DXR). The antitumor activity of inf-DXR equalled that of free DXR as well as that of lip-DXR at doses of >0.25 mg/kg. The overall survival of tumor-bearing animals treated with 2.0 mg/kg lip-DXR was significantly prolonged (P<0.01) in comparison with that of animals treated with 2.0 mg/kg free DXR; however, treatment with 2.0 mg/kg inf-DXR did not induce a significant prolongation of survival. At a cumulative dose of 12 mg/kg, inf-DXR appeared to be as effective as lip-DXR in reducing the severity of cardiomyopathy induced by free DXR. However, for the reduction of nephropathy, only therapy with lip-DXR was effective Inf-DXR induced high nephropathy scores comparable with those obtained with free DXR. For the first 24 h after an injection of 2.0 mg/kg or after the start of a continuous infusion of 2.0 mg/kg given over 24 h, similar areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) were calculated for free DXR and inf-DXR. However, for lip-DXR a much higher value was calculated. The higher plasma levels of lip-DXR did not result in higher cardiac levels. After five daily doses of 2.0 mg/kg, a much lower DXR concentration was found in cardiac tissue after the administration of lip-DXR than after the administration of free DXR or inf-DXR. This suggests that an important parameter to be determined and correlated with biological results is the free (i.e. not bound to liposomes) circulating fraction of DXR in lip-DXR-injected animals. In conclusion, in the IgM immunocytoma system the administration of DXR as a continuous infusion was as effective as DXR encapsulated in liposomes in reducing cardiotoxicity while preserving the antitumor effect; this indicates that the avoidance of peak plasma levels is an important component of the mode of action of DXR-containing liposomes. However, if both antitumor efficacy and nephrotoxicity are taken into account, lip-DXR could be considered to be superior to inf-DXR.