A Technical Assessment of the Utility of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays for the Study of the Functional Proteome in Non-microdissected Human Breast Cancers
Open Access
- 23 October 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Clinical Proteomics
- Vol. 6 (4) , 129-151
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12014-010-9055-y
Abstract
Introduction The lack of large panels of validated antibodies, tissue handling variability, and intratumoral heterogeneity potentially hamper comprehensive study of the functional proteome in non-microdissected solid tumors. The purpose of this study was to address these concerns and to demonstrate clinical utility for the functional analysis of proteins in non-microdissected breast tumors using reverse phase protein arrays (RPPA). Methods Herein, 82 antibodies that recognize kinase and steroid signaling proteins and effectors were validated for RPPA. Intraslide and interslide coefficients of variability were <15%. Multiple sites in non-microdissected breast tumors were analyzed using RPPA after intervals of up to 24 h on the benchtop at room temperature following surgical resection. Results Twenty-one of 82 total and phosphoproteins demonstrated time-dependent instability at room temperature with most variability occurring at later time points between 6 and 24 h. However, the 82-protein functional proteomic “fingerprint” was robust in most tumors even when maintained at room temperature for 24 h before freezing. In repeat samples from each tumor, intratumoral protein levels were markedly less variable than intertumoral levels. Indeed, an independent analysis of prognostic biomarkers in tissue from multiple tumor sites accurately and reproducibly predicted patient outcomes. Significant correlations were observed between RPPA and immunohistochemistry. However, RPPA demonstrated a superior dynamic range. Classification of 128 breast cancers using RPPA identified six subgroups with markedly different patient outcomes that demonstrated a significant correlation with breast cancer subtypes identified by transcriptional profiling. Conclusion Thus, the robustness of RPPA and stability of the functional proteomic “fingerprint” facilitate the study of the functional proteome in non-microdissected breast tumors.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pathway Biomarker Profiling of Localized and Metastatic Human Prostate Cancer Reveal Metastatic and Prognostic SignaturesJournal of Proteome Research, 2009
- A Portrait of Tissue Phosphoprotein Stability in the Clinical Tissue Procurement ProcessMolecular & Cellular Proteomics, 2008
- Signal pathway profiling of epithelial and stromal compartments of colonic carcinoma reveals epithelial-mesenchymal transitionOncogene, 2007
- A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypesCancer Cell, 2006
- The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal CancersScience, 2006
- A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Microarray analysis of prostate cancer progression to reduced androgen dependence: Studies in unique models contrasts early and late molecular eventsMolecular Carcinogenesis, 2004
- PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patientsCancer Cell, 2004
- A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implicationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001