Use of Telemedicine in Periodic Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Telemedicine was used for taking ocular fundus images of diabetic patients, which were subsequently sent by electronic mail to experienced ophthalmologists at a university hospital. The ophthalmologists provided reports on the patients to the internists. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this telemedicine system. A total of 279 diabetic patients were admitted to the Third Department of Internal Medicine of Yokohama City University Hospital, School of Medicine, for blood sugar control or for education on lifestyle between April, 1999, and October, 2000. The subjects did not have eye disease nor diabetic retinopathy when evaluated by an ophthalmologist (at either Yokohama City University Hospital or other facility) within 3 months before enrollment in the study. After dilation of the pupil, fundus images were taken of each eye from four angles using a nonmydriatic fundus camera. The images were transmitted by electronic mail to the Division of Ophthalmology of Tokyo University Branch Hospital along with other patient information. The ophthalmologists there evaluated the images on the screen according to Fukuda's classification of diabetic retinopathy. They sent ophthalmologic reports to the internists at the Third Department of Internal Medicine of Yokohama City University Hospital, School of Medicine, and recommended whether the patient should be seen by his/her regular ophthalmologist earlier than the next scheduled visit. Fundus images were obtained at the time of admission, at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge, and at every 6 months thereafter. Out of the images of 1170 eyes obtained at various time points from the 279 patients, 1076 (92.0%) were successfully evaluated by the ophthalmologists at the University of Tokyo, while 60 (5.1%) could not be evaluated and there was a communication problem for the images of 34 eyes. The ophthalmologists determined that 5 eyes of 3 patients required further evaluation by the patient's regular ophthalmologist based on the images transferred by telemedicine. No patient dropped out during the study period.