The Divergence of Legal Procedures
- 1 July 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
- Vol. 1 (2) , 138-162
- https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.2.138
Abstract
Simeon Djankov et al. (2003) introduce a measure of the quality of contract enforcement—the formalism of civil procedure—for 109 countries as of 2000. For 40 of these countries, we compute procedural formalism every year since 1950. We find that large differences in procedural formalism between common and civil law countries existed in 1950 and widened by 2000. For this area of law, the findings are inconsistent with the hypothesis that national legal systems are converging, and support the view that legal origins exert long lasting influence on legal rules. (JEL K41, O17)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Economic Consequences of Legal OriginsJournal of Economic Literature, 2008
- Legal Regime and Contractual Flexibility: A Comparison of Business's Organizational Choices in France and the United States during the Era of IndustrializationAmerican Law and Economics Review, 2005
- The Regulation of LaborThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the twentieth centuryPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Legal OriginsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002
- Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or FunctionThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 2001
- The quality of governmentJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1999
- Some Comments on European Procedural HarmonizationThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1997
- Political Integration and Procedural Convergence in the European UnionThe American Journal of Comparative Law, 1997
- European Legal Systems are not ConvergingInternational & Comparative Law Quarterly, 1996