Long-term evaluation of a CNS prophylaxis trial--treatment comparisons and outcome after CNS relapse in childhood ALL: a report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group.
- 1 October 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 5 (10) , 1646-1654
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1987.5.10.1646
Abstract
The current status of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who had developed CNS disease while being treated on protocol CCG-101 was investigated. Seven hundred thirty-six eligible patients were entered into the study between June 1972 and July 1974. All children who were > 18 months of age were eligible for randomization to a CNS prophylaxis trial for which one regimen gave only a short course of intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX) as prophylaxis. All other regimens included radiation therapy as prophylaxis. Current follow-up (median, > 10 years) shows no significant difference by standard life-table analysis for ultimate survival, although a substantial excess of CNS episodes occurred on the IT MTX regimen. Of the 675 patients who completed induction therapy and achieved remission in the study, 100 (14.8%) developed CNS disease as the first evidence of relapse. Fifty-five of these 100 had no subsequent CNS epidoses. Only 17 of these 55 patients are surviving without further relapses since the CNS episode. The median time to isolated CNS relapse was 457 days. Time to the initial CNS relapse was found to be the most important factor for predicting outcome. Thirty-five of the 55 patients with isolated relapse subsequently relapsed in the bone marrow, and of these, 32 have died. Twenty patients of the 100 with CNS disease as the first evidence of relapse developed two episodes of CNS involvement and 17 of these 20 patients subsequently relapsed in the bone marrow; only one patient survived. Twenty-five patients of the 100 have shown a pattern of chronic CNS disease with multiple CNS relapses. The overall disease-free survival for the 100 patients who developed one or more relapses was only 16%. These data demonstrate that the occurrence of a CNS relapse is an indicator of poor subsequent outcome. Comparison of results of groups receiving different CNS prophylaxis required careful consideration of the entire pattern of relapses and mortality.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The importance of an isolated central nervous system relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- Central nervous system morbidity following an initial isolated central nervous system relapse and its subsequent therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- Comparison of Intermediate-Dose Methotrexate with Cranial Irradiation for the Post-Induction Treatment of Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in ChildrenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- CNS prophylaxis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Comparison of two methods a southwest oncology group studyCancer, 1982
- SANCTUARY THERAPY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 724 CHILDREN WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC-LEUKEMIA - A REPORT FROM CHILDRENS CANCER STUDY-GROUP1982
- EQUIVALENCE OF INTRATHECAL CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIOTHERAPY AS CENTRAL NERVOUS-SYSTEM PROPHYLAXIS IN CHILDREN WITH ACUTE LYMPHATIC-LEUKEMIA - A PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY1982
- Evaluation of radiation therapy factors in prophylactic central nervous system irradiation for childhood leukemia: A report from the Children's Cancer Study GroupInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1981
- PRESYMPTOMATIC CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM THERAPY IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED CHILDHOOD ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKAEMIA: COMPARISON OF 1800 RAD AND 2400 RADThe Lancet, 1981
- Testicular relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Association with pretreatment patient characteristics and treatment. A report for childrens cancer study groupCancer, 1980
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977