A Controlled Trial of Inpatient and Outpatient Geriatric Evaluation and Management
Top Cited Papers
- 21 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 346 (12) , 905-912
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa010285
Abstract
Over the past 20 years, both inpatient units and outpatient clinics have developed programs for geriatric evaluation and management. However, the effects of these interventions on survival and functional status remain uncertain. We conducted a randomized trial involving frail patients 65 years of age or older who were hospitalized at 11 Veterans Affairs medical centers. After their condition had been stabilized, patients were randomly assigned, according to a two-by-two factorial design, to receive either care in an inpatient geriatric unit or usual inpatient care, followed by either care at an outpatient geriatric clinic or usual outpatient care. The interventions involved teams that provided geriatric assessment and management according to Veterans Affairs standards and published guidelines. The primary outcomes were survival and health-related quality of life, measured with the use of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36), one year after randomization. Secondary outcomes were the ability to perform activities of daily living, physical performance, utilization of health services, and costs. A total of 1388 patients were enrolled and followed. Neither the inpatient nor the outpatient intervention had a significant effect on mortality (21 percent at one year overall), nor were there any synergistic effects between the two interventions. At discharge, patients assigned to the inpatient geriatric units had significantly greater improvements in the scores for four of the eight SF-36 subscales, activities of daily living, and physical performance than did those assigned to usual inpatient care. At one year, patients assigned to the outpatient geriatric clinics had better scores on the SF-36 mental health subscale, even after adjustment for the score at discharge, than those assigned to usual outpatient care. Total costs at one year were similar for the intervention and usual-care groups. In this controlled trial, care provided in inpatient geriatric units and outpatient geriatric clinics had no significant effects on survival. There were significant reductions in functional decline with inpatient geriatric evaluation and management and improvements in mental health with outpatient geriatric evaluation and management, with no increase in costs.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Geriatric‐Based Versus General Wards for Older Acute Medical Patients: A Randomized Comparison of Outcomes and Use of ResourcesJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
- A Randomized Trial of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Care of Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- A Randomized Trial of Care in a Hospital Medical Unit Especially Designed to Improve the Functional Outcomes of Acutely Ill Older PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The Value of Geriatric InterventionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trialsPublished by Elsevier ,1993
- Geriatric Evaluation and Management: Current Status and Future Research DirectionsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1991
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Geriatric Assessment Unit in a Community Rehabilitation HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Consultative geriatric assessment for ambulatory patients. A randomized trial in a health maintenance organizationJAMA, 1990
- The Emergence of Geriatric Assessment UnitsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1987
- Effectiveness of a Geriatric Evaluation UnitNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984