Gene expression responses over 24 h to lengthening and shortening contractions in human muscle: major changes in CSRP3, MUSTN1, SIX1, and FBXO32
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Physiological Genomics
- Vol. 31 (1) , 42-52
- https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00151.2006
Abstract
Resistance training using lengthening (eccentric) contractions induces greater increases in muscle size than shortening (concentric) contractions, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are not clear. Using temporal expression profiling, we compared changes in gene expression within 24 h of an acute bout of each type of contractions conducted simultaneously in the quadriceps of different legs. Five healthy young men performed shortening contractions with one leg while the contralateral leg performed lengthening contractions. Biopsies were taken from both legs before exercise and 3, 6, and 24 h afterwards, in the fed state. Expression profiling (n = 3) was performed using a custom-made Affymetrix MuscleChip containing probe sets of ∼3,300 known genes and expressed sequence tags expressed in skeletal muscle. We identified 51 transcripts differentially regulated between the two exercise modes. Using unsupervised hierarchical clustering, we identified four distinct clusters, three of which corresponded to unique functional categories (protein synthesis, stress response/early growth, and sarcolemmal structure). Using quantitative RT-PCR (n = 5), we verified expression changes (lengthening/shortening) in SIX1 (3 h, −1.9-fold, P < 0.001), CSRP3 (6 h, 2.9-fold, P < 0.05), and MUSTN1 (24 h, 4.3-fold, P < 0.05). We examined whether FBXO32/atrogin-1/MAFbx, a known regulator of protein breakdown and of muscle atrophy was differentially expressed: the gene was downregulated after lengthening contractions (3 h, 2.7-fold, P < 0.05; 6 h, 3.3-fold, P < 0.05; 24 h, 2.3-fold, P < 0.05). The results suggested that lengthening and shortening contractions activated distinct molecular pathways as early as 3 h postexercise. The molecular differences might contribute to mechanisms underlying the physiological adaptations seen with training using the two modes of exercise.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- De novo myofibrillogenesis in C2C12 cells: evidence for the independent assembly of M bands and Z disksAmerican Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 2006
- Costameres, focal adhesions, and cardiomyocyte mechanotransductionAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 2005
- NELIN, a new F-actin associated protein, stimulates HeLa cell migration and adhesionBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2005
- Are exercise‐induced genes induced by exercise?The FASEB Journal, 2004
- Expression profiling — best practices for data generation and interpretation in clinical trialsNature Reviews Genetics, 2004
- Embryonic myogenesis pathways in muscle regenerationDevelopmental Dynamics, 2004
- Eya protein phosphatase activity regulates Six1–Dach–Eya transcriptional effects in mammalian organogenesisNature, 2003
- Response of rat muscle to acute resistance exercise defined by transcriptional and translational profilingThe Journal of Physiology, 2002
- Delayed Muscle SorenessSports Medicine, 1995
- A morphological study of delayed muscle sorenessCellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1981