Thymic dysfunction in the mutant diabetic (db/db) mouse.
Open Access
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 130 (3) , 1195-1199
- https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.130.3.1195
Abstract
Thymic function has been explored in genetically diabetic homozygous C57BL/KsJ (db/db) mice by evaluating their serum thymic factor (FTS) levels with a rosette assay. As previously reported for other autoimmune mice (NZB or MRL/I mice), the age-dependent decline of FTS levels was significantly accelerated in diabetic mice when compared to heterozygous littermates. Furthermore, FTS inhibitory molecules were detected in db/db mouse sera (as early as 10 wk of age) as evaluated by their ability to absorb in vitro the activity of synthetic FTS in the rosette assay, and in vivo for their capacity to induce the disappearance of endogenous FTS when injected into normal mice. These inhibitors were shown to be immunoglobulins. Histologically, the thymus presented an accelerated involution starting with a cortical lymphocytic depletion and an increased number of Hassall's corpuscles. Ultrastructural studies showed alterations in thymic epithelial cells, mainly represented by an increasing number of cytoplasmic vacuoles. By means of indirect immunofluorescence with anti-FTS monoclonal antibodies, it was shown that the number of FTS+ cells was reduced in db/db mouse thymuses: at the age of 22 wk, diabetic mice had 10 times fewer FTS+ cells than heterozygotes of the same age. Taken together, these results indicate important abnormalities in the thymus of diabetic mice. It is possible that the associated lymphocyte dysfunction plays a role in the pathogenesis of the autoimmune disease presented by db/db mice.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Levels of Prolactin, Growth Hormone and Insulin in Genetically Diabetic (db/db) MiceExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1979
- Immune response in the mutant diabetic C57BL/Ks-dt+ mouse. Discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo immunological assays.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1978