Errors of Commission as a Function of Age and Temperament in a Type of Vigilance Task
Open Access
- 1 November 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 18 (4) , 358-361
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746608400054
Abstract
Forty subjects monitored a 40 min. series of 10-sec. intervals containing digits (spoken at the rate of 1 per sec.), each followed by 10-sec. silence. The task was to report whether or not three consecutive and different odd digits occurred. Responses were forced. The results showed that there was no correlation between either age or temperament and the number of correct detections made. Older subjects, however, made more errors of commission, and were less able to distinguish wanted from unwanted events. The younger and introverted subjects appeared to be more cautious. The data is discussed in terms of the arousal theory of vigilance performance.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vigilance, Age, and Response-TimeThe American Journal of Psychology, 1964
- VIGILANCE CONSIDERED AS A STATISTICAL DECISIONBritish Journal of Psychology, 1963
- Arousal, Channel-Capacity and DecisionNature, 1962
- Construct ‘Reactive Inhibition’ in the Interpretation of Age Changes in PerformanceNature, 1960
- EXTRAVERSION‐INTROVERSION AND IMPROVEMENT IN AN AUDITORY VIGILANCE TASK*British Journal of Psychology, 1959
- A TWO-PART PERSONALITY MEASURE FOR USE AS A RESEARCH CRITERIONBritish Journal of Psychology, 1956