Testing Fisher, Neyman, Pearson, and Bayes
- 1 May 2005
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician
- Vol. 59 (2) , 121-126
- https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005x20871
Abstract
This article presents a simple example that illustrates the key differences and similarities between the Fisherian, Neyman-Pearson, and Bayesian approaches to testing. Implications for more complex...Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bayesian Statistics and the Efficiency and Ethics of Clinical TrialsStatistical Science, 2004
- Confusion Over Measures of Evidence (p's) Versus Errors (α's) in Classical Statistical TestingThe American Statistician, 2003
- Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing?Statistical Science, 2003
- Significantly InsignificantFTestsThe American Statistician, 2003
- Bayes for Beginners? Some Reasons to HesitateThe American Statistician, 1997
- Teaching Elementary Bayesian Statistics with Real Applications in ScienceThe American Statistician, 1997
- Teaching Bayes' Rule: A Data-Oriented ApproachThe American Statistician, 1997
- Sampling and Bayes' Inference in Scientific Modelling and RobustnessJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 1980