Relative importance of microhabitat, plant form and photosynthetic physiology to carbon gain in two alpine herbs
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Functional Ecology
- Vol. 15 (2) , 243-251
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00506.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in Microsite, Plant Form, and Low-Temperature Photoinhibition in Alpine PlantsArctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 2000
- High resistance to low‐temperature photoinhibition in two alpine, snowbank speciesPhysiologia Plantarum, 2000
- Protection against photoinhibition in the alpine plant Geum montanumOecologia, 1999
- Photosynthesis and photoinhibition in a tropical alpine giant rosette plant, Lobelia rhynchopetalumNew Phytologist, 1997
- Microclimate factors influencing the frequency and duration of growth season frost for subalpine plantsAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1995
- Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis in NatureAnnual Review of Plant Biology, 1994
- Subnivean and Emergent Microclimate, Photosynthesis, and Growth in Erythronium grandiflorum Pursh, a Snowbank GeophyteArctic and Alpine Research, 1994
- Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis in NatureAnnual Review of Plant Biology, 1994
- Leaf temperatures during radiation frost Part II. A steady state theoryAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1988
- Leaf temperatures during radiation frost Part I. ObservationsAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1988