Contralateral Sound Stimulation Suppresses the Compound Action Potential from the Auditory Nerve in Humans
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 23 (5) , 784-788
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200209000-00029
Abstract
Background In the past decade, contralateral sound suppression of otoacoustic emissions has been extensively used to study the role of the medial olivocochlear efferent in humans. In most studies, the suppressive effect of contralateral sound stimulation was not greater than 2 to 4 dB. However, the relation between the degree of otoacoustic emission reduction and the neural auditory threshold is unknown. Methods The current study investigates the effect of contralateral sound stimulation by measuring compound action potential response from the auditory nerve during retrosigmoid surgery in humans. Results Although only a small number of subjects responded to contralateral sound stimulation, we report that efferent activation by contralateral sound stimulation results in 10 dB effective neural attenuation. Conclusions Together with previous otoacoustic emission measurements in humans, this result demonstrates that the suppressive effect of contralateral noise suppression is greater when measured with compound action potential than otoacoustic emissions, and that contralateral sound suppressive effect is at least as strong in humans as in animals.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A developmental study of distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in humansHearing Research, 1998
- The effect of contralateral broad-band noise on acoustic distortion products from the human earHearing Research, 1997
- Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humansHearing Research, 1993
- Effect of contralateral sound stimulation on the distortion product 2F1−F2: Evidence that the medial efferent system is involvedThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- Binaural interaction in auditory brain-stem responses: effects of maskingElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985
- The selective effects of central masking on brain stem potentialsBritish Journal of Audiology, 1984
- Effect of contralateral and ipsilateral masking of acoustic stimulation on the latencies of auditory evoked potentials from cochlea and brain stemElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1983
- Will Contralateral White Noise Interfere with the Monaurally Click-Evoked Brainstem Response?Scandinavian Audiology, 1983
- Use of Contralateral Masking in the Measurement of the Auditory Brainstem ResponseJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1982
- Brain Stem Auditory Evoked ResponsesArchives of Neurology, 1979