Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs
- 30 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 66 (9) , 973-981
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Applying the Risk of Bias Tool in a Systematic Review of Combination Long-Acting Beta-Agonists and Inhaled Corticosteroids for Persistent AsthmaPLOS ONE, 2011
- A descriptive analysis of a representative sample of pediatric randomized controlled trials published in 2007BMC Pediatrics, 2010
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?PLoS Medicine, 2010
- Assessment of Risk of Bias Among Pediatric Randomized Controlled TrialsPediatrics, 2010
- The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMedBMJ, 2010
- Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional studyBMJ, 2009
- Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic ReviewPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2008
- The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysisJAMA, 1999
- Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklistsControlled Clinical Trials, 1995