An Evaluation of Skeletal Attachment to LTI Pyrolytic Carbon, Porous Titanium, and Carbon-coated Porous Titanium Implants
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 182 (&NA;) , 242???257
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198401000-00033
Abstract
Porous titanium, carbon-coated porous titanium, and low-temperature isotropic (LTI) pyrolytic carbon transcortical implants were placed in the femora of mongrel dogs. Mechanical and histologic analyses were performed in specimens that remained in situ for six months. Qualitative histologic results indicated that the bone formed a direct appositional interface with as-deposited LTI carbon. The bone tissue response to the two systems with porous coatings was similar. Both systems showed little fibrous tissue interposition and a high degree of mineralized bone ingrowth. The ingrown bone was well organized. However, there was some evidence that the ingrown bone mineral differed significantly from the bulk bone mineral. The only difference between carbon-coated and uncoated porous systems was a significant increase in the percentage of bone ingrowth, with carbon-coated specimens having a 4% increase in bone volume. The strength of appositional attachment to LTI carbon was shown to be at least one order of magnitude weaker than bone ingrowth attachment to the porous systems. The interface shear stiffness of the two porous systems was equivalent; however, the attachment shear strength of bone growth into carbon-coated porous titanium was significantly increased compared with that of bone growth into the uncoated porous titanium. Correlation of the percentage of bone ingrowth and pushout strength was also found to be statistically significant, suggesting that the presence of the carbon coating enhanced bone ingrowth, which resulted in significantly increased shear strengths.This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: