Societal Reaction And The Physically Disabled: Bringing The Impariment Back In*
- 1 March 1980
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Symbolic Interaction
- Vol. 3 (1) , 139-156
- https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1980.3.1.139
Abstract
According to the societal reaction perspective, the reactions of the nondisabled are the key to understanding the physically disabled. Consequently, stigmatization has been emphasized in explaining the often awkward and inhibited encounters between the disabled and the nondisabled. Stigmatization, though, cannot fully explain interaction between the disabled and the nondisabled. Through a qualitative analysis of encounters between the deaf and the hearing, 1 demonstrate that disabilities are also disruptive when they cause the assumptions and routine practices which usually successfully maintain interaction to become problematic. Coping strategies are attempts to compensate for those assumptions and practices which have failed. The reactions of the nondisabled are important in understanding the physically disabled, but in more complex ways than the societal reaction perspective has so far suggested.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Caring, Control, and Clinicians' Influence: Ethical Dilemmas in Development DisabilitiesEthics & Behavior, 1999
- Outsiders in a Hearing WorldUrban Life, 1979
- An eye for an ear? Social perception, nonverbal communication, and deafness.Rehabilitation Psychology, 1974
- An eye for an ear? Social perception, nonverbal communication, and deafness.Rehabilitation Psychology, 1974
- Deviance Avowal as Neutralization of CommitmentSocial Problems, 1972
- Sequencing in Conversational Openings1American Anthropologist, 1968
- The Efects of Physical Deviance upon Face-to-Face InteractionHuman Relations, 1966
- Judgment of personal characteristics and emotions from nonverbal properties of speech.Psychological Bulletin, 1963
- Blindness and the Role of CompanionSocial Problems, 1956
- Speech and speech-reading tests for the deaf.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1929