Arterial graft patency in coronary artery bypass grafting: what do we really know?

This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:

• Midterm results after minimally invasive coronary surgery (last operation)
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1998
• Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years
  Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
• Five-year follow-up of microsurgical multiple internal thoracic artery grafts
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
• Late follow-up of 781 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting for an isolated obstruction in the left anterior descending coronary artery
  American Heart Journal, 1989
• Internal Mammary Artery versus Saphenous Vein Graft to the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery: Prospective Randomized Study with 10-Year Follow-up
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
• Internal Mammary Artery Grafts: Technical Factors Influencing Patency
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1986
• The Internal Mammary Artery: The Ideal Coronary Bypass Graft?
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
• Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac Events
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
• Isolated left anterior descending coronary atherosclerosis: long-term comparison of internal mammary artery and venous autografts.
  Circulation, 1980
• Coronary bypass graft fate: angiographic grading of 1400 consecutive grafts early after operation and of 1132 after one year.
  Circulation, 1978