What Have We Learned From Psychoactive Drug Research on Hyperactives?
- 1 February 1972
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Vol. 123 (2) , 177-180
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1972.02110080155025
Abstract
There is little question but that the problem of children who are hyperactive is both widespread and of serious concern. Moreover, there appears to be little question that the treatment, though satisfactory in some ways, raises more questions for the critical observer and physician than it answers. The research dealing with the use of drugs to benefit children who are hyperactive has now accumulated data for more than a third of a century. Like all pioneer research, it must be interpreted with considerable caution. With the exception of a few of the latest studies reported by a very limited number of the more sophisticated researchers, the conclusions and recommendations for the most part have been made uncritically, even optimistically, due possibly to confidence in the clinical acuity of an experienced professional, even though critical interpretation of a study does not warrant definitive conclusions. Although some studies dealing with the useKeywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFECTS OF METHYLPHENIDATE (RITALIN) ON THE MOTOR SKILLS AND BEHAVIOR OF CHILDREN WITH LEARNING PROBLEMSJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1969
- Drug Effects on Learning in Children A Selective Review of the Past Thirty YearsThe Journal of Special Education, 1966
- Efficacy of Tranquilizing and Antidepressant DrugsArchives of General Psychiatry, 1965
- Inference and suggestion in a clinical trial (Niamid in Mongolism)Journal of Mental Science, 1962
- THE POWERFUL PLACEBOJAMA, 1955